home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: informatik.tu-muenchen.de!fischerj
- From: fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: C2P
- Date: 16 Jan 1996 01:06:36 GMT
- Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4detms$mpj@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- References: <4daq27$fjq@sinsen.sn.no> <4dccj4$rt4@maureen.teleport.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Stephan Schaem (sschaem@teleport.com) wrote:
- : Thore Bjerklund Karlsen (tbk@sn.no) wrote:
- : : (Stephan Schaem)
-
- : : >: Why not just measure it in scanlines? Why ms?
-
- : : > An even better measure 'standart' : pixel second :)
-
- you mean pixel/second I guess.
-
- : having a ms report of convereting a 320x256 screen is totaly weird.
- noooo.
- : scanline is the same thing... you need to define your scanline timing.
- a scanline is 64ns on amiga (i.e. anyone talking about scanlines means
- a PAL/NTSC one).
-
- : A pixel and a second is well defined... What is more logical?
-
- : 1) I can c2p 4.4 mpixel per second on a 25mhz 030
- : or
- : 2) I can c2p a 320x256 screen in 18.5 ms ...
-
- logic ? both is information. and the latter one gives me the information
- that it'll do it beyond one frame.
-
- : Stephan
-
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) =:)
-